Surgical treatment options for carpal tunnel syndrome
- 17 October 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Vol. 2014 (3) , CD003905
- https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd003905.pub3
Abstract
Carpal tunnel syndrome is a common disorder for which several surgical treatment options are available. To compare the efficacy of the various surgical techniques in relieving symptoms and promoting return to work or activities of daily living and to compare the occurrence of side-effects and complications in patients suffering from carpal tunnel syndrome. We updated the searches in 2006. We conducted computer-aided searches of the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Trials Register (searched in June 2006), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2006, Issue 2), MEDLINE (January 1966 to June 2006), EMBASE (January 1980 to June 2006) and also tracked references in bibliographies. Randomised controlled trials comparing various surgical techniques for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. Two review authors performed study selection, assessment of methodological quality and data extraction independently of each other. Thirty-three studies were included in the review of which 10 were newly identified in this update. The methodological quality of the trials ranged from fair to good; however, the use of allocation concealment was mentioned explicitly in only seven trials. Many studies failed to present the results in sufficient detail to enable statistical pooling. Pooling was also impeded by the vast variety of outcome measures that were applied in the various studies. None of the existing alternatives to standard open carpal tunnel release offered significantly better relief from symptoms in the short- or long-term. In three studies with a total of 294 participants, endoscopic carpal tunnel release resulted in earlier return to work or activities of daily living than open carpal tunnel release, with a weighted mean difference of -6 days (95% CI -9 to -3 days). There is no strong evidence supporting the need for replacement of standard open carpal tunnel release by existing alternative surgical procedures for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. The decision to apply endoscopic carpal tunnel release instead of open carpal tunnel release seems to be guided by the surgeon's and patient's preferences.Keywords
This publication has 81 references indexed in Scilit:
- Outcomes of endoscopic surgery compared with open surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome among employed patients: randomised controlled trialBMJ, 2006
- Mini-Open Blind Procedure Versus Limited Open Technique for Carpal Tunnel Release: A 30-Month Follow-Up StudyThe Journal of Hand Surgery, 2005
- A review of treatment for carpal tunnel syndromeDisability and Rehabilitation, 2003
- Operative Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome in DenmarkJournal of Hand Surgery (European Volume), 1997
- Endoscopic carpal tunnel release versus open procedure: a prospective randomized studyJournal of Hand Surgery (European Volume), 1996
- Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trialsJAMA, 1995
- Morphologic changes following endoscopic and two-portal subcutaneous carpal tunnel releaseThe Journal of Hand Surgery, 1994
- Outcome following epineurotomy in carpal tunnel syndrome: A prospective, randomized clinical trialThe Journal of Hand Surgery, 1994
- Minimal-incision open carpal tunnel decompressionThe Journal of Hand Surgery, 1994
- Internal neurolysis or ligament division only in carpal tunnel syndrome II a 3 year follow-up with an evaluation of various neurophysiological parameters for diagnosisActa Neurochirurgica, 1987