A Curriculum out of Balance
- 1 June 1989
- journal article
- Published by American Educational Research Association (AERA) in Educational Researcher
- Vol. 18 (5) , 9-15
- https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x018005009
Abstract
Opportunity to learn is among the most important influences on student achievement, yet the empirical basis for knowing what is taught in schools is surprisingly weak. Elementary school mathematics is used as a context for considering what could be learned from careful descriptions of classroom content. Teacher logs and interviews show that large numbers of mathematics topics are taught for exposure with no expectation of student mastery, much of what is taught in one grade is taught again in the next, skills typically receive 10 times the emphasis given to either conceptual understanding or application, and, depending on the accidents of school and teacher assignment, the amount of mathematics instruction a student receives may be doubled or halved. These attributes of the curriculum are not in the best interests of students. Recommendations for change are offered.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Instructional Leadership at the District Level: A Closer Look at Autonomy and ControlEducational Administration Quarterly, 1988
- How Much of the Content in Mathematics Textbooks Is New?The Arithmetic Teacher, 1987
- Do Textbooks and Tests Define a National Curriculum in Elementary School Mathematics?The Elementary School Journal, 1983
- Responses to curriculum pressures: A policy-capturing study of teacher decisions about content.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1981
- Generalizability of Measures of Teaching BehaviorReview of Educational Research, 1976
- A Model of School LearningTeachers College Record: the Voice of Scholarship in Education, 1963