Methods to assess intended effects of drug treatment in observational studies are reviewed
- 1 December 2004
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 57 (12) , 1223-1231
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.03.011
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 64 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of predictions based on observational data with the results of randomized controlled clinical trials of coronary artery bypass surgeryPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Randomised trials comparing chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: biases and evolution over timeEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 2003
- Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental VariablesJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1996
- Importance of events per independent variable in proportional hazards regression analysis II. Accuracy and precision of regression estimatesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1995
- Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trialsJAMA, 1995
- Does more intensive treatment of acute myocardial infarction in the elderly reduce mortality? Analysis using instrumental variablesPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1994
- Effects of Misspecification of the Propensity Score on Estimators of Treatment EffectPublished by JSTOR ,1993
- Constructing a Control Group Using Multivariate Matched Sampling Methods That Incorporate the Propensity ScoreThe American Statistician, 1985
- Current problems and future challenges in randomized clinical trials.Circulation, 1984
- The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effectsBiometrika, 1983