Assisted reproductive technology and birth defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 28 February 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Human Reproduction Update
- Vol. 19 (4) , 330-353
- https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmt006
Abstract
It has been 10 years since we carried out a systematic search of the literature on birth defect risk in infants born following assisted reproductive technology (ART) compared with non-ART infants. Because of changes to ART practice since that review and the publication of more studies the objective of this review was to include these more recent studies to estimate birth defect risk after ART and to examine birth defect risk separately in ART singletons and multiples. We searched Medline, Embase and Current Contents databases (1978–2012). We used the same data extraction sheet and questionnaire we had used previously with the addition of a quality score to the questionnaire. Pooled relative risk (RR) estimates were calculated using a random effects model. All data were analysed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis V2. There were 45 cohort studies included in this review. ART infants (n = 92 671) had a higher risk of birth defects [RR 1.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.24–1.42] compared with naturally conceived infants (n = 3 870 760). The risk further increased when data were restricted to major birth defects (RR 1.42, 95% CI 1.29–1.56) or singletons only (RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.30–1.43). The results for ART multiples were less clear. When all data for multiples were pooled the RR estimate was 1.11 (95% CI 0.98–1.26) but this increased to 1.26 (0.99–1.60) when the analysis was restricted to studies of ART twins where some adjustment was made for differences in zygosity distribution between ART and non-ART multiples. Birth defects remain more common in ART infants. Further research is required to examine risks for important subgroups of ART exposure.Keywords
This publication has 159 references indexed in Scilit:
- Malformation risk in subfertile couplesReproductive BioMedicine Online, 2012
- ART, birth defects and subfertility—what should prospective patients be told?Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2011
- A meta-analysis of the impact of IVF and ICSI on major malformations after adjusting for the effect of subfertilityJournal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2011
- Infertility treatment use in relation to selected adverse birth outcomesFertility and Sterility, 2010
- Adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes in subfertile women conceiving without assisted reproductive technologiesFertility and Sterility, 2010
- Congenital anomalies and other perinatal outcomes in ICSI vs. naturally conceived pregnancies: a comparative studyJournal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2009
- A comparison of spontaneously conceived twins and twins conceived by artificial reproductive technologiesJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2008
- Postnatal growth and health in children born after cryopreservation as embryosThe Lancet, 1998
- Impact of infertility treatments on the health newbornsFertility and Sterility, 1998
- Congenital malformations and psychosocial development in children conceived by in vitro fertilizationThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1989