Phylogenetic classification and the definition of taxon names
- 1 January 1994
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Zoologica Scripta
- Vol. 23 (1) , 19-25
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-6409.1994.tb00369.x
Abstract
Taxon names should be founded on phylogenetic relationships. and the names defined on the basis of common ancestry. Definitions based on evolutionary relationships relate the names to a phylogeny, and while the inclusiveness of the name may change with changing hypotheses of monophyly, the actual name remains unaltered. The limits of the name arc fixed by pointing to a monophyletic clade, where group membership is determined by the relationship to this clade. and not to subjective decisions of taxon delineations. Since phylogenetic definitions unambiguously connect the name to a specified clade, and not to a type, the conventional type concept becomes superfluous. We furthermore consider the Linnean categories poorly suited to convey the information in evolutionary trees, and suggest that these categories are abandoned.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Phylogenetic definitions and taxonomic philosophyBiology & Philosophy, 1992
- Phylogeny as a Central Principle in Taxonomy: Phylogenetic Definitions of Taxon NamesSystematic Zoology, 1990
- Code international de nomenclature zoologiquePublished by Biodiversity Heritage Library ,1985
- METAPHORS AND TYPOLOGY IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF BOTANICAL SYSTEMATICS 1690–1960, OR THE ART OF PUTTING NEW WINE IN OLD BOTTLESTaxon, 1984
- The Future of Linnaean NomenclatureSystematic Zoology, 1976
- On the foundations of biological systematicsActa Biotheoretica, 1974
- Form and function : a contribution to the history of animal morphology / by E. S. Russell.Published by Smithsonian Institution ,1916