Read Something Once, Why Read it Again?: Repetitive Reading and Recall
Open Access
- 1 December 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Reading Behavior
- Vol. 21 (4) , 351-360
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10862968909547684
Abstract
Seventy-two college students were instructed that they would be reading a text either once or twice. Then, half of each instruction group were allowed to read the text once, and half were required to read the text twice. All subjects were then tested for factual retention and for transfer. The instruction that a text could be read twice facilitated recall, even if the text was only read once. Reduced anxiety appears to be the simplest explanation for this. Reading a text twice increased factual retention, but on the transfer test, an interaction with ability was found. Only high ability students showed improvement with a second reading on the transfer test. Results are interpreted in terms of Mayer's processing strategies in that good readers benefit both qualitatively and quantitatively from repetition. Poor readers benefit only quantitatively from the opportunity to reread.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quantitative and qualitative effects of repetition on learning from technical text.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1986
- Repetitive Reading and Recall of Expository TextReading Research Quarterly, 1986
- Inducing Use of a Text Lookback Strategy Among Unsuccessful ReadersAmerican Educational Research Journal, 1984
- Can you repeat that? Qualitative effects of repetition and advance organizers on learning from science prose.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1983
- What is learned in note taking?Journal of Educational Psychology, 1981
- Monitoring and Resolving Comprehension Obstacles: An Investigation of Spontaneous Text Lookbacks among Upper-Grade Good and Poor ComprehendersReading Research Quarterly, 1981
- Can Advance Organizers Influence Meaningful Learning?Review of Educational Research, 1979
- PRESENTATION VARIABLES AND STUDENTS' ACTIVITIES IN MEANINGFUL LEARNINGBritish Journal of Educational Psychology, 1975
- Textual constraint as function of repeated inspection.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1968
- The comparative effectiveness of certain study techniques in the field of history.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1942