Childhood Immunization Registries
Open Access
- 1 October 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine
- Vol. 156 (10) , 978-985
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.156.10.978
Abstract
Objectives To assess the availability and use of Washington State's CHILD (Children's Health, Immunization, Linkages, and Development) Profile and other computerized immunization tracking systems, to determine physicians' attitudes about these systems, and to identify factors associated with using them. Design Randomized, population-based, cross-sectional survey. Participants Washington family physician and pediatrician specialty organization members providing childhood immunizations in 1998 (N = 2472). Main Outcome Measure Reported CHILD Profile and other computerized systems use. Results The adjusted response rate was 75% (n = 1331). Overall, 37.7% of respondents had heard of CHILD Profile, 6.3% used it, and 24.9% used other systems. Groups significantly more likely not to use computerized systems than referent pediatricians in areas fully implementing CHILD Profile were family physicians (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-4.0), private physicians (aOR, 8.0; 95% CI, 3.2-20.1), physicians taking fewest opportunities to immunize (aOR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.4-3.7), and physicians practicing in local health jurisdiction areas with CHILD Profile marketing activity (aOR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.2-3.9) or in those areas with little or no registry activity (aOR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.6-4.4). Those with systems agreed that they save time (71.0%), make status checks easier (87.1%), and increase immunization coverage (88.6%). Those without systems agreed that they help practices (90.3%) and increase efficiency (76.5%), but fewer agreed that they reduce costs (30.2%). Conclusions Although most physicians agreed that computerized systems are useful, few had them or used them. Provider-based systems can improve immunization coverage, but the feasibility and effectiveness of communitywide and statewide systems remain unexplored. Because these systems depend on participation, more understanding is needed to help organizations implement them. Interventions to increase availability and use should address provider and health organization needs.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Providers’ perceptions of an immunization registryAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 1999
- Improving Immunization Coverage Rates: An Evidence-based Review of the LiteratureEpidemiologic Reviews, 1999
- Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journalsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1997
- Computer-generated recall letters for underimmunized children: how cost-effective?The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 1997
- Missed Opportunities for Immunizations: A Review of the EvidenceJournal of Public Health Management & Practice, 1996
- Childhood immunization registries. A national review of public health information systems and the protection of privacyJAMA, 1995
- Development of a vaccine tracking system to improve the rate of age-appropriate primary immunization in children of lower socioeconomic statusThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1995
- A Randomized Trial of the Effectiveness of Computer-Generated Telephone Messages in Increasing Immunization Visits Among Preschool ChildrenArchives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 1994
- Preschool children at high risk for measles: opportunities to vaccinate.American Journal of Public Health, 1993
- What Will It Take to Fully Protect All American Children With Vaccines?Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 1991