The Effects of Group Discussion on Eyewitness Accuracy
- 1 June 1980
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Applied Social Psychology
- Vol. 10 (3) , 249-259
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1980.tb00707.x
Abstract
Previous research on group performance in judgmental tasks reveals that groups are rarely inferior, and often superior, to the average individual. The present study examined whether this pattern of results extends to the accuracy of eyewitness reports of a crime. It was found that group discussion led to accounts that were significantly more accurate than the average individual. A requirement to reach a unanimous decision did not alter any of the effects of group discussion. Group superiority was especially clear in terms of the completeness of the reports and in estimations of the duration of the incident. The discussion considered the implications of the present results for the current practice of prohibiting group discussion as an aid to the preparation of testimony.This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Some conditions maximizing eyewitness accuracy: A learning/memory analogyJournal of Criminal Justice, 1980
- Applied eyewitness-testimony research: System variables and estimator variables.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1978
- Individual and situational factors in eyewitness testimony.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1978
- Applied eyewitness-testimony research: System variables and estimator variables.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1978
- Individual and situational factors in eyewitness testimony.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1978
- Memory for faces and the circumstances of encounter.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1977
- Psychology and the Law: an OvertureAnnual Review of Psychology, 1976
- Recognition for faces of own and other race.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1969
- The “tip of the tongue” phenomenonJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1966
- Group Problem Solving Effectiveness under Conditions of Pooling vs. InteractionThe Journal of Social Psychology, 1963