Cost-Effectiveness of Early Irbesartan Treatment Versus Control (Standard Antihypertensive Medications Excluding ACE Inhibitors, Other Angiotensin-2 Receptor Antagonists, and Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel Blockers) or Late Irbesartan Treatment in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes, Hypertension, and Renal Disease
- 1 August 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Diabetes Association in Diabetes Care
- Vol. 27 (8) , 1897-1903
- https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.27.8.1897
Abstract
OBJECTIVE—The aim of this study was to determine the most cost-effective time point for initiation of irbesartan treatment in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes and renal disease. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—This study was a Markov model–simulated progression from microalbuminuria to overt nephropathy, doubling of serum creatinine, end-stage renal disease, and death in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes. Two irbesartan strategies were created: early irbesartan 300 mg daily (initiated with microalbuminuria) and late irbesartan (initiated with overt nephropathy). These strategies were compared with control, which consisted of antihypertensive therapy with standard medications (excluding ACE inhibitors, other angiotensin-2 receptor antagonists, and dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers) with comparable blood pressure control, initiated at microalbuminuria. Transition probabilities were taken from the Irbesartan in Reduction of Microalbuminuria-2 study, Irbesartan in Diabetic Nephropathy Trial, and other published sources. Costs and life expectancy, discounted at 3% yearly, were projected over 25 years for 1,000 simulated patients using a third-party payer perspective in a U.S. setting. RESULTS—Compared with control, early and late irbesartan treatment in 1,000 patients were projected to save (mean ± SD) $11.9 ± 3.3 million and $3.3 ± 2.7 million, respectively. Early use of irbesartan added 1,550 ± 270 undiscounted life-years (discounted 960 ± 180), whereas late irbesartan added 71 ± 40 life-years (discounted 48 ± 27) in 1,000 patients. Early irbesartan treatment was superior under a wide-range of plausible assumptions. CONCLUSIONS—Early irbesartan treatment was projected to improve life expectancy and reduce costs in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria. Later use of irbesartan in overt nephropathy is also superior to standard care, but irbesartan should be started earlier and continued long term.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Multifactorial Intervention and Cardiovascular Disease in Patients with Type 2 DiabetesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Development and progression of nephropathy in type 2 diabetes: The United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS 64)Kidney International, 2003
- Intensified multifactorial intervention in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and microalbuminuria: the Steno type 2 randomised studyPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- Ramipril prolongs life and is cost effective in chronic proteinuric nephropathiesKidney International, 2001
- Responding to the challenge of diabetic nephropathy: the historic evolution of detection, prevention and managementJournal of Human Hypertension, 2000
- Long-term effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and metabolic control in hypertensive type 2 diabetic patientsKidney International, 2000
- Outcome Results of the Fosinopril Versus Amlodipine Cardiovascular Events Randomized Trial (FACET) in Patients With Hypertension and NIDDMDiabetes Care, 1998
- An Economic Analysis of Captopril in the Treatment of Diabetic NephropathyDiabetes Care, 1996
- Mortality in Diabetic Subjects: An Eleven‐year Follow‐up of a Community‐based PopulationDiabetic Medicine, 1994
- Captopril or conventional therapy in hypertensive type II diabetics. Three-year analysis.Hypertension, 1993