Abstract versus modality-specific memory representations in processing auditory and visual speech
- 1 September 1992
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Memory & Cognition
- Vol. 20 (5) , 533-538
- https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03199585
Abstract
Serial recall of lip-read, auditory, and audiovisual memory lists with and without a verbal suffix was examined. Recency effects were the same in the three presentation modalities. The disrupting effect of a suffix was largest when it was presented in the same modality as the list items. The results suggest that abstract linguistic as well as modality-specific codes play a role in memory for auditory and visual speech.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Face recognition and lip-reading in autismThe European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 1991
- A framework for interpreting recency effects in immediate serial recallMemory & Cognition, 1988
- Adding sound to lipread lists: The effects on serial recall of adding an auditory pulse train and a pure tone to silently lipread listsMemory & Cognition, 1988
- On recency and echoic memoryPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences, 1983
- The purity of auditory memoryPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences, 1983
- Further evidence of interference between lipreading and auditory recency.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1983
- Nonauditory suffix effects in congenitally deaf signers of American Sign Language.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1981
- Interactions, partial interactions, and interaction contrasts in the analysis of variance.Psychological Bulletin, 1979
- The stimulus suffix effect as a memory coding phenomenonMemory & Cognition, 1978
- Hearing lips and seeing voicesNature, 1976