Freedom and need: The evolution of public strategy for biomedical and health research in England
Open Access
- 29 January 2008
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Health Research Policy and Systems
- Vol. 6 (1) , 2
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-6-2
Abstract
The optimal support of health-related research and development with public money is a complex challenge. Over the last century, policy makers in England have conceived and implemented a variety of models, ranging from independent, curiosity driven research to needs-based state commissions, and promoting different bodies to oversee scientific work. This paper traces these approaches, identifies the principles that drove them, and discusses their role in shaping policy for publicly funded health research, up to the recent launch of a new research strategy by the Department of Health.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reforming clinical research and development in EnglandBMJ, 2003
- Research Assessment in the UKScience, 2002
- Government pulls plug on regional research and development fundingBMJ, 2001
- Budget crisis forces hard choices on US high-energy physicsNature, 2000
- A NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT:Lessons from EnglandAnnual Review of Public Health, 1997
- Welcoming the Culyer reportBMJ, 1994
- LONDON PERSPECTIVE Medical research versus the internal marketThe Lancet, 1994
- Wanted: guidelines that doctors will follow.BMJ, 1993
- The health of the nation's research and development.BMJ, 1993
- Scientists in WhitehallPhysics in Technology, 1979