Reaching targets in the national cervical screening programme: are current practices unethical?
Open Access
- 1 June 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Medical Ethics
- Vol. 24 (3) , 151-157
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.24.3.151
Abstract
The principle of informed consent is now well established within the National Health Service (NHS) in relation to any type of medical treatment. However, this ethical principle appears to be far less well established in relation to medical screening programmes such as Britain's national cervical screening programme. This article will critically examine the case for health care providers vigorously pursuing women to accept an invitation to be screened. It will discuss the type of information which women would need in order to make an informed decision about whether or not to be screened. The lack of such information in current patient leaflets on the "smear test" will then be documented. Finally, the article will explore possible ways of maximising women's autonomy in relation to the cervical screening programme without sacrificing any of its main benefits.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Inequalities in Health: What Health Systems Can and Cannot DoJournal of Health Services Research & Policy, 1996
- Detection rates for abnormal cervical smears: what are we screening for?The Lancet, 1995
- Why is preventive medicine exempted from ethical constraints?Journal of Medical Ethics, 1990
- Cervical screening in general practice: a "new" scenario.BMJ, 1990
- Women's knowledge and experience of cervical screening: a failure of health education and medical organization.1989
- CERVICAL SMEARS: A QUESTIONABLE PRACTICE?The Lancet, 1989
- Cervical cancer in nuns and prostitutes: A plea for scientific continenceJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1988
- Psychosexual trauma of an abnormal cervical smearBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1988