Comparison of two procedures for laparovaginal hysterectomy: a randomized trial
- 1 May 2000
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
- Vol. 90 (1) , 31-36
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-2115(99)00221-3
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- A new technique and system for simplifying total laparoscopic hysterectomyThe Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, 1998
- Indications of laparoscopic hysterectomyEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 1997
- Laparoscopically Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy: Report of 190 CasesJournal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 1997
- Total Hysterectomy by Laparoscopy: Advantage for the Patient or Only a Surgical Gimmick?Journal of Gynecologic Surgery, 1996
- Proposed classification of hysterectomies involving laparoscopyThe Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, 1995
- Initial experience with laparoscopic‐assisted Doderlein hysterectomyBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1995
- Is laparoscopic hysterectomy a waste of time?The Lancet, 1995
- A randomised prospective study of laparoscopic vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy each with bilateral salpingo‐oophorectomyBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1994
- Can laparoscopic assisted hysterectomy safely replace abdominal hysterectomy?BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1993
- Laparoscopic HysterectomyJournal of Gynecologic Surgery, 1989