Containment of Biogenic Sulfide Production in Continuous Up‐Flow Packed‐Bed Bioreactors with Nitrate or Nitrite

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Produced water from the Coleville oil field in Saskatchewan, Canada was used to inoculate continuous up‐flow packed‐bed bioreactors. When 7.8 mM sulfate and 25 mM lactate were present in the in‐flowing medium, H2S production (souring) by sulfate‐reducing bacteria (SRB) was prevented by addition of 17.5 mM nitrate or 20 mM nitrite. Changing the sulfate or lactate concentration of the in‐flowing medium indicated that the concentrations of nitrate or nitrite required for containment of souring decreased proportionally with a lowered concentration of the electron donor lactate, while the sulfate concentration of the medium had no effect. Microbial communities were dominated by SRB. Nitrate addition did not give rise to changes in community composition, indicating that lactate oxidation and H2S removal were caused by the combined action of SRB and nitrate‐reducing, sulfide‐oxidizing bacteria (NR‐SOB). Apparently the nitrite concentrations formed by these NR‐SOB did not inhibit the SRB sufficiently to cause community shifts. In contrast, significant community shifts were observed upon direct addition of high concentrations (20 mM) of nitrite. Strains NO3A and NO2B, two newly isolated, nitrate‐reducing bacteria (NRB) emerged as major community members. These were found to belong to the ϵ‐division of the Proteobacteria, to be most closely related to Campylobacter lari, and to oxidize lactate with nitrate or nitrite as the electron acceptor. Thus the mechanism of microbial H2S removal in up‐flow packed‐bed bioreactors depended on whether nitrate (SRB/NR‐SOB) or nitrite (SRB/NR‐SOB as well as NRB) was used. However, the amount of nitrate or nitrite needed to completely remove H2S was dictated by the electron donor (lactate) concentration, irrespective of mechanism.