Using Natural Settings for Environmental Education: Perceived Benefits and Barriers
- 1 January 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Environmental Education
- Vol. 29 (3) , 23-31
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00958969809599115
Abstract
What motivates teachers to use various nature settings for environmental education (EE) is complex; in this study these motivations were described. Teachers (N = 59) were shown photographs of four types of outdoor settings (rivers, ponds, and marshes; deep woods; county park; and urban nature) and asked to judge each setting using questionnaire items that described potential benefits and barriers to taking students to the setting for EE. Factor analysis of responses showed six benefit and barrier factors: Appropriateness of Teaching Setting, Teacher Confidence, Worries, Need for Training, Hazards, and Difficulty of Teaching EE. Deep woods and rivers, ponds, and marshes settings were seen as significantly more appropriate for teaching EE than urban nature was, but they were also seen as presenting significantly more hazards than county park and urban nature settings.Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- Facilitating Teachers' Use of Natural Areas: Perceptions of Environmental Education OpportunitiesThe Journal of Environmental Education, 1993
- The Teacher's Perspective of the Resident Environmental Education ExperienceThe Journal of Environmental Education, 1988
- Barriers to Environmental EducationThe Journal of Environmental Education, 1988