On Feature Strength: Three Minimalist Approaches to Overt Movement
- 1 April 1999
- journal article
- Published by MIT Press in Linguistic Inquiry
- Vol. 30 (2) , 197-217
- https://doi.org/10.1162/002438999554039
Abstract
Procrastinate (Chomsky 1993) favors covert movement; therefore, when movement is overt, it must have been forced to operate “early” by some special requirement, one that Chomsky codes into “strong features.” I compare Chomsky's three successive theories of strong features and argue that two ellipsis phenomena, pseudogapping and sluicing, provide evidence bearing on the nature of strong features. I argue that movement or ellipsis can rescue a derivation with a strong feature, and I conclude that PF crash is relevant either directly, as in Chomsky 1993, or indirectly, as in the theory presented in Chomsky 1995a augmented by the multiple-chain theory of pied-piping (especially as interpreted by Ochi (1998)).Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sluicing and logical formNatural Language Semantics, 1995
- Object positionsNatural Language & Linguistic Theory, 1991
- On multiple questions and multiple WH frontingNatural Language & Linguistic Theory, 1988
- Bound VPs that need to beLinguistics and Philosophy, 1987