Making Optimum Use of the Microbiology Laboratory
- 2 April 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA)
- Vol. 247 (13) , 1868-1871
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1982.03320380060035
Abstract
PREVIOUS articles in this series have emphasized the need for physicians to review with microbiologists ways of obtaining results from the microbiology laboratory that are more useful. Physicians and microbiologists must work together to facilitate interpretation of laboratory data used to guide antimicrobial therapy. The techniques used and the mode of reporting information should optimize therapy at minimum cost. ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY: 'S-I-R' VS MICs In recent years, much technological change has occurred in the in vitro testing of antimicrobial susceptibility of bacteria isolated from clinical specimens. The disk method of testing was applied initially in a highly unstandardized manner and led to unreliable results in many instances. More recently, the Kirby-Bauer method has become highly standardized in the majority of laboratories. Still, most physicians are only vaguely aware of how the designations "S," "I," and "R," which stand forsensitive, intermediate (or indeterminate) sensitivity, andresistance, relate to achievable antimicrobialKeywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- The inhibitory quotient. A method for interpreting minimum inhibitory concentration dataJAMA, 1981
- Analysis of Serum Bactericidal Activity In Endocarditis, Osteomyelitis, and Other Bacterial InfectionsMedicine, 1981
- A System for Reporting Quantitative Antimicrobic Susceptibility Test ResultsAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1979
- Physician Responsibility for the Cost of Unnecessary Medical ServicesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978
- Protecting the Medical Commons: Who Is Responsible?New England Journal of Medicine, 1975