Metastasis-Associated Gene Expression Changes Predict Poor Outcomes in Patients with Dukes Stage B and C Colorectal Cancer
Top Cited Papers
- 14 December 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Clinical Cancer Research
- Vol. 15 (24) , 7642-7651
- https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-09-1431
Abstract
Purpose: Colorectal cancer prognosis is currently predicted from pathologic staging, providing limited discrimination for Dukes stage B and C disease. Additional markers for outcome are required to help guide therapy selection for individual patients. Experimental Design: A multisite single-platform microarray study was done on 553 colorectal cancers. Gene expression changes were identified between stage A and D tumors (three training sets) and assessed as a prognosis signature in stage B and C tumors (independent test and external validation sets). Results: One hundred twenty-eight genes showed reproducible expression changes between three sets of stage A and D cancers. Using consistent genes, stage B and C cancers clustered into two groups resembling early-stage and metastatic tumors. A Prediction Analysis of Microarray algorithm was developed to classify individual intermediate-stage cancers into stage A–like/good prognosis or stage D–like/poor prognosis types. For stage B patients, the treatment adjusted hazard ratio for 6-year recurrence in individuals with stage D–like cancers was 10.3 (95% confidence interval, 1.3-80.0; P = 0.011). For stage C patients, the adjusted hazard ratio was 2.9 (95% confidence interval, 1.1-7.6; P = 0.016). Similar results were obtained for an external set of stage B and C patients. The prognosis signature was enriched for downregulated immune response genes and upregulated cell signaling and extracellular matrix genes. Accordingly, sparse tumor infiltration with mononuclear chronic inflammatory cells was associated with poor outcome in independent patients. Conclusions: Metastasis-associated gene expression changes can be used to refine traditional outcome prediction, providing a rational approach for tailoring treatments to subsets of patients. (Clin Cancer Res 2009;15(24):7642–51)Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Individualized Prediction of Colon Cancer Recurrence Using a NomogramJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2008
- Oxaliplatin Combined With Weekly Bolus Fluorouracil and Leucovorin As Surgical Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage II and III Colon Cancer: Results From NSABP C-07Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2007
- Multiple Gene Expression Classifiers from Different Array Platforms Predict Poor Prognosis of Colorectal CancerClinical Cancer Research, 2007
- Gene Expression Profiling Reveals a Massive, Aneuploidy-Dependent Transcriptional Deregulation and Distinct Differences between Lymph Node–Negative and Lymph Node–Positive Colon CarcinomasCancer Research, 2007
- Stage II Colon Cancer Prognosis Prediction by Tumor Gene Expression ProfilingJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2006
- Type, Density, and Location of Immune Cells Within Human Colorectal Tumors Predict Clinical OutcomeScience, 2006
- Gene-Expression Profiling Predicts Recurrence in Dukes’ C Colorectal CancerGastroenterology, 2005
- Molecular Staging for Survival Prediction of Colorectal Cancer PatientsJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2005
- Gene Expression Profiles and Molecular Markers To Predict Recurrence of Dukes' B Colon CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2004
- Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation responseProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2001