Survival With Aromatase Inhibitors and Inactivators Versus Standard Hormonal Therapy in Advanced Breast Cancer: Meta-analysis
Open Access
- 20 September 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Vol. 98 (18) , 1285-1291
- https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djj357
Abstract
Background: Aromatase inhibitors and inactivators have been extensively tested in patients with advanced breast cancer, but it is unclear whether they offer any survival benefits compared with standard hormonal treatment with tamoxifen or progestagens. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared several generations of aromatase inhibitors and inactivators with standard hormonal treatment in patients with advanced breast cancer. Methods: The endpoint that we assessed was survival. Trials were located through searches of PubMed and Cochrane Library (last update March 2006). Relative hazards (RHs) were summarized across trials through fixed- and random-effects analyses, and heterogeneity was assessed with the Q and I2 statistics. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: Twenty-five different comparisons, with a total of 8504 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. We found statistically significant survival benefits with third-generation aromatase inhibitors and inactivators (vorozole, letrozole, examestane, and anastrazole) (RH = 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.82 to 0.93; P <.001) but not with first-generation (aminoglutethimide) or second-generation (formestane and fadrozole) agents. The difference in the summary effects between these two groups of trials was statistically significant ( P = .04). The survival benefit with third-generation agents in first-line trials, in which these agents were compared with tamoxifen (11% RH reduction, 95% CI = 1% to 19%; P = .03), was identical to their benefit in second- and subsequent-line trials in which these agents were compared with other treatments (14% RH reduction, 95% CI = 6% to 21%; P <.001). Conclusions: Inhibition of the aromatase system, in particular with third-generation aromatase inhibitors and inactivators, appears to be associated with statistically significant improved survival of patients with advanced breast cancer compared with standard hormonal treatments.Keywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Anastrozole (Arimidex™) versus tamoxifen as first-line therapy for advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women: survival analysis and updated safety resultsEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 2003
- Anastrozole Versus Tamoxifen as First-Line Therapy in Postmenopausal Patients With Hormone-Dependent Advanced Breast CancerAmerican Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2003
- Anastrozole alone or in combination with tamoxifen versus tamoxifen alone for adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal women with early breast cancer: first results of the ATAC randomised trialThe Lancet, 2002
- Superior Efficacy of Letrozole Versus Tamoxifen as First-Line Therapy for Postmenopausal Women With Advanced Breast Cancer: Results of a Phase III Study of the International Letrozole Breast Cancer GroupJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2001
- Systematic reviews of chemotherapy and endocrine therapy in metastatic breast cancerCancer Treatment Reviews, 2000
- Cancer statistics, 2000CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2000
- First-line fadrozole HCI (CGS 16949A) versus tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancerAnnals of Oncology, 1996
- A randomised study of CGS 16949A (fadrozole) versus tamoxifen in previously untreated postmenopausal patients with metastatic breast cancerAnnals of Oncology, 1996
- Hormonal treatment for metastatic breast cancer. An eastern cooperative oncology group phase III trial comparing aminoglutethimide to tamoxifenCancer, 1994
- Second and third line hormonotherapy in advanced post-menopausal breast cancer: a multicenter randomized trial comparing medroxyprogesterone acetate with aminoglutethimide in patients who have become resistant to tamoxifenBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 1992