The Current Use of Impella 2.5 in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: Results from the USpella Registry
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 13 December 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Interventional Cardiology
- Vol. 27 (1) , 1-11
- https://doi.org/10.1111/joic.12080
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the periprocedural characteristics and outcomes of patients supported with Impella 2.5 prior to percutaneous coronary intervention (pre‐PCI) versus those who received it after PCI (post‐PCI) in the setting of cardiogenic shock (CS) complicating an acute myocardial infarction (AMI).Background: Early mechanical circulatory support may improve outcome in the setting of CS complicating an AMI. However, the optimal timing to initiate hemodynamic support has not been well characterized.Methods: Data from 154 consecutive patients who underwent PCI and Impella 2.5 support from 38 US hospitals participating in the USpella Registry were included in our study. The primary end‐point was survival to discharge. Secondary end‐points included assessment of patients' hemodynamics and in‐hospital complications. A multivariate regression model was used to identify independent predictors for mortality.Results: Both groups were comparable except for diabetes (P = 0.02), peripheral vascular disease (P = 0.008), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P = 0.05), and prior stroke (P = 0.04), all of which were more prevalent in the pre‐PCI group. Patients in the pre‐PCI group had more lesions (P = 0.006) and vessels (P = 0.01) treated. These patients had also significantly better survival to discharge compared to patients in the post‐PCI group (65.1% vs.40.7%, P = 0.003). Survival remained favorable for the pre‐PCI group after adjusting for potential confounding variables. Initiation of support prior to PCI with Impella 2.5 was an independent predictor of in‐hospital survival (Odds ratio 0.37, 95% confidence interval: 0.17–0.79, P = 0.01) in multivariate analysis. The incidence of in‐hospital complications included in the secondary end‐point was similar between the 2 groups.Conclusions: The results of our study suggest that early initiation of hemodynamic support prior to PCI with Impella 2.5 is associated with more complete revascularization and improved survival in the setting of refractory CS complicating an AMI. (J Interven Cardiol 2014;27:1–11)Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- The outcome of intra-aortic balloon pump support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock according to the type of revascularization: A comprehensive meta-analysisAmerican Heart Journal, 2013
- Intra-aortic balloon pump in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: results of the ALKK-PCI registryClinical Research in Cardiology, 2012
- Intraaortic Balloon Support for Myocardial Infarction with Cardiogenic ShockNew England Journal of Medicine, 2012
- A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial of Hemodynamic Support With Impella 2.5 Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Patients Undergoing High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary InterventionCirculation, 2012
- Hemodynamic Effects of Intra-aortic Balloon Counterpulsation in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic ShockShock, 2012
- 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary InterventionJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2011
- Thirty-Year Trends (1975 to 2005) in the Magnitude of, Management of, and Hospital Death Rates Associated With Cardiogenic Shock in Patients With Acute Myocardial InfarctionCirculation, 2009
- Ten-Year Trends in the Incidence and Treatment of Cardiogenic ShockAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2008
- A Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of a Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Device Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping for Treatment of Cardiogenic Shock Caused by Myocardial InfarctionJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2008
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of intra-aortic balloon pump therapy in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: should we change the guidelines?European Heart Journal, 2008