User Input Mode and Computer-Aided Instruction
- 1 June 1968
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
- Vol. 10 (3) , 225-232
- https://doi.org/10.1177/001872086801000304
Abstract
An evaluation of on-line computer-aided instruction within a management information system compared typewriter and lightpen input modes as students learned to use the system. The following conclusions were supported: 1. Computer-aided instruction is feasible in a general-purpose management information system; 2. It is also feasible to demonstrate retention of learned material through computer-administered tests; 3. Professional typing skills are not necessary to use the typewriter input mode effectively, provided that the inputs required are short and direct; 4. In this particular setting there seemed to be evidence that the typewriter was a more effective input device than the lightpen during the instructional sequence, but this evidence is questionable in view of considerable individual differences among the students; 5. Regardless of performance, students responded favorably to their experience with computer-aided instruction.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Computer-Aided Instruction as Part of a Management Information SystemHuman Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1967
- A study of remote industrial training via computer-assisted instruction.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1967
- The Uses of Computers in EducationScientific American, 1966
- The Development and Current Status of Computer-Based InstructionAmerican Educational Research Journal, 1965
- AESOPPublished by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) ,1965
- Generalized Teaching Machine Decision Structure with Application to Speed ReadingPublished by Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) ,1964
- Problems and prospectus of teaching with a computer.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1964
- A recalculation of four adult readability formulas.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1958