Quantum Theory and Explanatory Discourse: Endgame for Understanding?
- 1 September 1991
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Philosophy of Science
- Vol. 58 (3) , 337-358
- https://doi.org/10.1086/289621
Abstract
Empirical adequacy, formal explanation and understanding are distinct goals of science. While no a priori criterion for understanding should be laid down, there may be inherent limitations on the way we are able to understand explanations of physical phenomena. I examine several recent contributions to the exercise of fashioning an explanatory discourse to mold the formal explanation provided by quantum mechanics to our modes of understanding. The question is whether we are capable of truly understanding (or comprehending) quantum phenomena, as opposed to simply accepting the formalism and certain irreducible quantum correlations. The central issue is that of understanding versus merely redefining terms to paper over our ignorance.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Non-locality and locality in the stochastic interpretation of quantum mechanicsPhysics Reports, 1989
- Unified dynamics for microscopic and macroscopic systemsPhysical Review D, 1986
- Unnatural Attitudes: Realist and Instrumentalist Attachments to ScienceMind, 1986
- Bell’s theorem and the foundations of quantum physicsAmerican Journal of Physics, 1985
- On the Physical Significance of the Locality Conditions in the Bell ArgumentsNoûs, 1984
- And Not Anti-Realism EitherNoûs, 1984
- Running backwards the Mermin device: Causality in EPR correlationsAmerican Journal of Physics, 1983
- Is quantum theory universally valid?American Journal of Physics, 1982
- Hidden Variables, Joint Probability, and the Bell InequalitiesPhysical Review Letters, 1982
- Non‐Locality, Causality and Aether in Quantum MechanicsAstronomische Nachrichten, 1982