Interpretation of bone densitometry measurements: Disadvantages of a percentage scale and a discussion of some alternatives
- 1 June 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
- Vol. 5 (6) , 537-540
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.5650050602
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Perspectives: Methodologic issues in evaluating risk factors for osteoporotic fracturesJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1989
- Baseline Measurement of Bone Mass Predicts Fracture in White WomenAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1989
- Defining osteoporosisCalcified Tissue International, 1989
- Age and bone mass as predictors of fracture in a prospective study.Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1988
- Bone Density MeasurementJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1988
- A model for estimating the potential costs and savings of osteoporosis prevention strategiesBone, 1988
- Lifetime fracture risk: An approach to hip fracture risk assessment based on bone mineral density and ageJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1988
- The definition and diagnosis of osteoporosisCalcified Tissue International, 1987
- Involutional OsteoporosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- Proceedings: The effect of chronic renal failure and maintenance hemodialysis on bone mineral content of the radiusAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1976