A Comparison of Lipid and Glycemic Effects of Pioglitazone and Rosiglitazone in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Dyslipidemia
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 July 2005
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Diabetes Association in Diabetes Care
- Vol. 28 (7) , 1547-1554
- https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.28.7.1547
Abstract
OBJECTIVE—Published reports suggest that pioglitazone and rosiglitazone have different effects on lipids in patients with type 2 diabetes. However, these previous studies were either retrospective chart reviews or clinical trials not rigorously controlled for concomitant glucose- and lipid-lowering therapies. This study examines the lipid and glycemic effects of pioglitazone and rosiglitazone. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—We enrolled subjects with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes (treated with diet alone or oral monotherapy) and dyslipidemia (not treated with any lipid-lowering agents). After a 4-week placebo washout period, subjects randomly assigned to the pioglitazone arm (n = 400) were treated with 30 mg once daily for 12 weeks followed by 45 mg once daily for an additional 12 weeks, whereas subjects randomly assigned to rosiglitazone (n = 402) were treated with 4 mg once daily followed by 4 mg twice daily for the same intervals. RESULTS—Triglyceride levels were reduced by 51.9 ± 7.8 mg/dl with pioglitazone, but were increased by 13.1 ± 7.8 mg/dl with rosiglitazone (P < 0.001 between treatments). Additionally, the increase in HDL cholesterol was greater (5.2 ± 0.5 vs. 2.4 ± 0.5 mg/dl; P < 0.001) and the increase in LDL cholesterol was less (12.3 ± 1.6 vs. 21.3 ± 1.6 mg/dl; P < 0.001) for pioglitazone compared with rosiglitazone, respectively. LDL particle concentration was reduced with pioglitazone and increased with rosiglitazone (P < 0.001). LDL particle size increased more with pioglitazone (P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS—Pioglitazone and rosiglitazone have significantly different effects on plasma lipids independent of glycemic control or concomitant lipid-lowering or other antihyperglycemic therapy. Pioglitazone compared with rosiglitazone is associated with significant improvements in triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, LDL particle concentration, and LDL particle size.Keywords
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- Thiazolidinediones: comparison of long-term effects on glycemic control and cardiovascular risk factorsCurrent Medical Research and Opinion, 2004
- Dyslipidemia Management in Adults With DiabetesDiabetes Care, 2004
- Impact of adjunctive thiazolidinedione therapy on blood lipid levels and glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetesCurrent Medical Research and Opinion, 2004
- Case study. A diabetic patient with liver diseaseBritish Journal of Diabetes, 2004
- Dyslipidemia in Type 2 Diabetes and the Effects of ThiazolidinedionesThe Endocrinologist, 2003
- Thiazolidinediones and Blood Lipids in Type 2 DiabetesArteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, 2003
- Burgeoning Dilemmas in the Management of Diabetes and Cardiovascular DiseaseCirculation, 2003
- Differences in Lipid Profiles of Patients Given Rosiglitazone Followed by PioglitazoneCurrent Medical Research and Opinion, 2002
- Executive Summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III)JAMA, 2001
- Pioglitazone hydrochloride monotherapy improves glycemic control in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes: a 6-month randomized placebo-controlled dose-response study. The Pioglitazone 001 Study Group.Diabetes Care, 2000