Sovereignty and Emergency
- 1 August 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Theory, Culture & Society
- Vol. 19 (4) , 103-119
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276402019004008
Abstract
The Huntington thesis of the clash of cultures and American foreign policy analysis are both aspects of the legacy of Carl Schmitt's distinction between friend and foe. This article explores Schmitt's political theology as the theoretical basis of modern politics in terms of the concepts of state sovereignty and the idea of a permanent emergency. Within this Schmittian framework, the analysis of Islam as presented by writers such as Huntington, Fukuyama and Barber is critically analysed. Their analysis of fundamentalism and political Islam fails to grasp the complexity and diversity of modern Islam. The article concludes by examining a number of social and economic processes that make the political division between friend and foe untenable.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Religion and the Rise of DemocracyPublished by Taylor & Francis ,2012
- Transnational Muslim PoliticsPublished by Taylor & Francis ,2003
- Human Rights as Politics and IdolatryPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,2001
- Constitutional Caesarism: Weber’s politics in their German contextPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2000
- Political Theory and Political TheologyPolitical Theory, 1998
- Féminisme et islamisme dans le monde arabe: essai de synthèseSocial Compass, 1996
- Carl Schmitt and Leo StraussPublished by University of Chicago Press ,1995
- The Clash of Civilizations?Foreign Affairs, 1993
- The Shadow of God and the Hidden ImamPublished by University of Chicago Press ,1984
- Politics as a VocationPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1978