A guide for diagnostic evaluations
- 1 December 2006
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Reviews Microbiology
- Vol. 4 (S12) , S2-S6
- https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1568
Abstract
Accurate diagnostic tests have a key role in patient management and the control of most infectious diseases. Unfortunately, in many developing countries, clinical care is often critically compromised by the lack of regulatory controls on the quality of these tests. The information available on the performance of a diagnostic test can be biased or flawed because of failings in the design of the studies which assessed the performance characteristics of the test. As a result, diagnostic tests are sold and used in much of the developing world without evidence of effectiveness. Misdiagnosis leading to failure to treat a serious infection or wasting expensive treatment on people who are not infected remains a serious obstacle to health.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sample sizes of studies on diagnostic accuracy: literature surveyBMJ, 2006
- Importance of rapid testing to combat the global threat of bird fluExpert Review of Molecular Diagnostics, 2006
- Quality of Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy StudiesRadiology, 2005
- Diagnostics for the developing worldNature Reviews Microbiology, 2004
- Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD InitiativeClinical Chemistry, 2003
- More rigour needed in trials of new diagnostic agents for tuberculosisThe Lancet, 2000
- Systematic review of near patient test evaluations in primary careBMJ, 1999
- Use of Methodological Standards in Diagnostic Test ResearchJAMA, 1995
- Spectrum Bias in the Evaluation of Diagnostic Tests: Lessons from the Rapid Dipstick Test for Urinary Tract InfectionAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1992
- Problems of Spectrum and Bias in Evaluating the Efficacy of Diagnostic TestsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978