Convergence in Policy Outcomes: Social Security Systems in Perspective
- 1 April 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Journal of Public Policy
- Vol. 14 (2) , 147-174
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0143814x0000742x
Abstract
A central question in the welfare state debate has been whether or not social policies in industrialized countries converge. Originally linked to the logic of industrialism perspective, this idea has been criticized by researchers focusing on differences in timing and differences in the institutional set up of social security schemes across countries. Nonetheless, I argue that social security arrangements in European as well as Anglo-American countries may gradually become more similar. Using pension politics as the primary example, the article locates similar social and political mechanisms at work in different countries, pushing toward convergence in policy outcomes, despite persistent variation in institutional arrangements. In the final section of the article, I extract a model from the analysis, aimed at explaining political change while maintaining a connection between the micro and macro level of analysis.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- ARE SOCIAL CLASSES DYING?International Sociology, 1991
- WORLDVIEWInternational Social Security Review, 1991
- Social security in the USSRInternational Social Security Review, 1991
- The Politics of Social SolidarityPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1990
- The Danish 1891 Act on Old Age Relief: A Response to Agrarian Demand and PressureJournal of Social Policy, 1990
- The rise and evolution of public pension systemsPublic Choice, 1987
- Economics of Income RedistributionPublished by Springer Nature ,1983
- WHY THE SOCIAL INSURANCE BUDGET IS TOO LARGE IN A DEMOCRACYEconomic Inquiry, 1975
- The Fiscal Crisis of the StatePublished by Springer Nature ,1973
- Evolutionary Universals in SocietyAmerican Sociological Review, 1964