Positive End-expiratory Pressure Improves Respiratory Function in Obese but not in Normal Subjects during Anesthesia and Paralysis
- 1 November 1999
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Anesthesiology
- Vol. 91 (5) , 1221
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199911000-00011
Abstract
Background: Morbidly obese patients, during anesthesia and paralysis, experience more severe impairment of respiratory mechanics and gas exchange than normal subjects. The authors hypothesized that positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) induces different responses in normal subjects (n = 9; body mass index < 25 kg/m2) versus obese patients (n = 9; body mass index > 40 kg/m2). Methods: The authors measured lung volumes (helium technique), the elastances of the respiratory system, lung, and chest wall, the pressure-volume curves (occlusion technique and esophageal balloon), and the intraabdominal pressure (intrabladder catheter) at PEEP 0 and 10 cm H2O in paralyzed, anesthetized postoperative patients in the intensive care unit or operating room after abdominal surgery. Results: At PEEP 0 cm H2O, obese patients had lower lung volume (0.59 +/- 0.17 vs. 2.15 +/- 0.58 l [mean +/- SD], P < 0.01); higher elastances of the respiratory system (26.8 +/- 4.2 vs. 16.4 +/- 3.6 cm H2O/l, P < 0.01), lung (17.4 +/- 4.5 vs. 10.3 +/- 3.2 cm H2O/l, P < 0.01), and chest wall (9.4 +/- 3.0 vs. 6.1 +/- 1.4 cm H2O/l, P < 0.01); and higher intraabdominal pressure (18.8 +/-7.8 vs. 9.0 +/- 2.4 cm H2O, P < 0.01) than normal subjects. The arterial oxygen tension was significantly lower (110 +/- 30 vs. 218 +/- 47 mmHg, P < 0.01; inspired oxygen fraction = 50%), and the arterial carbon dioxide tension significantly higher (37.8 +/- 6.8 vs. 28.4 +/- 3.1, P < 0.01) in obese patients compared with normal subjects. Increasing PEEP to 10 cm H2O significantly reduced elastances of the respiratory system, lung, and chest wall in obese patients but not in normal subjects. The pressure-volume curves were shifted upward and to the left in obese patients but were unchanged in normal subjects. The oxygenation increased with PEEP in obese patients (from 110 +/-30 to 130 +/- 28 mmHg, P < 0.01) but was unchanged in normal subjects. The oxygenation changes were significantly correlated with alveolar recruitment (r = 0.81, P < 0.01). Conclusions: During anesthesia and paralysis, PEEP improves respiratory function in morbidly obese patients but not in normal subjects.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Lung and chest wall mechanics in normal anaesthetized subjects and in patients with COPD at different PEEP levelsEuropean Respiratory Journal, 1997
- Effects of PEEP on respiratory mechanics are tidal volume and frequency dependentRespiration Physiology, 1997
- Respiratory system mechanics in sedated, paralyzed, morbidly obese patientsJournal of Applied Physiology, 1997
- Total Respiratory System, Lung, and Chest Wall Mechanics in Sedated-Paralyzed Postoperative Morbidly Obese PatientsChest, 1996
- Alterations of lung and chest wall mechanics in patients with acute lung injury: effects of positive end-expiratory pressure.American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 1995
- RE-EXPANSION OF ATELECTASIS DURING GENERAL ANAESTHESIA: A COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY STUDYBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1993
- PERIOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF THE OBESE PATIENTBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1993
- Lung Collapse and Gas Exchange during General AnesthesiaAnesthesiology, 1987
- Airway Closure and Distribution of Inspired Gas in the Extremely Obese, Breathing Spontaneously and During Anaesthesia with Intermittent Positive Pressure VentilationActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 1976
- Effect of Obesity on respiratory complications following general anesthesiaAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1962