Randomized comparison of efficacy, acceptability and cost of medical versus surgical abortion
- 1 September 2000
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in Contraception
- Vol. 62 (3) , 117-124
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-7824(00)00151-7
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- The efficacy of medical abortion: a meta-analysisContraception, 2000
- MEASUREMENT OF PAINSurgical Clinics of North America, 1999
- Medical abortion with methotrexate 75 mg intramuscularly and vaginal misoprostolContraception, 1997
- Safety, efficacy, and acceptability of medical abortion in China, Cuba, and India: A comparative trial of mifepristone-misoprostol versus surgical abortionAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1997
- Analysis of failure in medical abortionContraception, 1996
- A randomized trial comparing misoprostol three and seven days after methotrexate for early abortionAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1995
- Methotrexate and misoprostol vs misoprostol alone for early abortion. A randomized controlled trialPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1994
- Endovaginal ultrasonographic measurement of early embryonic size as a means of assessing gestational age.Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 1994
- Conceptual age and ultrasound measurements of gestational sac and crown–rump length in in vitro fertilization pregnanciesFertility and Sterility, 1988
- Reducing the Morbidity of Vacuum Aspiration AbortionInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 1978