Ethical case deliberation on the ward. A comparison of four methods
- 1 January 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy
- Vol. 6 (3) , 235-246
- https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1025928617468
Abstract
The objective of this article is to analyse and compare four methods of ethical case deliberation. These include Clinical Pragmatism, The Nijmegen Method of ethical case deliberation, Hermeneutic...Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Question of Method in Ethics ConsultationAmerican Journal of Bioethics, 2001
- Bioethics and the Whole: Pluralism, Consensus, and the Transmutation of Bioethical Methods into GoldJournal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 1999
- The Socratic method in teaching medical ethics: Potentials and limitationsMedicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 1999
- The Internal Morality of Medicine: Explication and Application to Managed CareJournal of Medicine and Philosophy, 1998
- Clinical Pragmatism: Bridging Theory and PracticeKennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 1998
- Clinical Pragmatism: A Method of Moral Problem SolvingKennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 1997
- Framing the Physician‐Assisted Suicide and Voluntary Active Euthanasia Debate: The Role of Deontology, Consequentialism, and Clinical PragmatismJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 1995
- The hyperreality of clinical ethics: A unitary theory and hermeneuticsTheoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 1994
- Mediation and Communication Techniques in Ethics ConsultationThe Journal of Clinical Ethics, 1992
- Ethics Consultants and Ethics CommitteesArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1989