The first series of completely robotic esophagectomies with three-field lymphadenectomy: initial experience
- 26 June 2007
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Surgical Endoscopy
- Vol. 21 (12) , 2285-2292
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9405-7
Abstract
This study investigated the use of robotics to perform extended esophageal resection in a series of patients. A total of 14 patients with a median age of 64 years underwent esophagectomy using the da Vinci robot. At presentation, there were 12 cases of cancer, staged at T2N1 (n = 2), T3N0 (n = 2), T3N1 (n = 6), T4N1 (n = 1), and M1a (n = 1); 2 cases of high-grade dysplasia; 8 cases of adenocarcinoma; and 4 cases of squamous cell cancer; as well as 2 middle third, 9 lower third, and one gastroesophageal junction tumor. Nine patients had undergone preoperative chemoradiotherapy, and six had undergone prior abdominal surgery. The patients were categorized into three chronological groups according to the procedure performed. Group 1 consisted of the first three patients in the series, whose surgery was thoracic only (robotically assisted esophagectomy). Group 2, the next three patients, had robotically assisted thoracic esophagectomy plus thoracic duct ligation using a laparoscopic gastric conduit. Group 3, the last eight patients, underwent completely robotic esophagectomy. For Group 3, the total operating room time was 11.1 ± 0.8 h (range, 11.3–13.2 h), with a console time of 5.0 ± 0.5 h (range, 4.8–5.8 h). The estimated blood loss was 400 ± 300 ml (range, 200–950 ml). One patient in group 1 had a thoracic duct leak. In groups 2 and 3, thoracic duct ligation resulted in no further leaks. Other postoperative complications included severe pneumonia (1 case), atrial fibrillation (5 cases), cervical anastomotic leak (2 cases), wound infection (1 case), and bilateral vocal cord paresis requiring tracheostomy (1 case). In seven of the cases, no intensive care unit time was required. There was one death from pneumonia 72 days after the procedure. The rate of disease-free survival was 87%. The robotic approach facilitates an extended three-field esophagolymphadenectomy even after induction therapy and abdominal surgery. Larger scale trials are needed to define the role of this technique.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Three-Field Lymphadenectomy for Carcinoma of the Esophagus and Gastroesophageal Junction in 174 R0 Resections: Impact on Staging, Disease-Free Survival, and OutcomeAnnals of Surgery, 2004
- Chronic symptoms after subtotal or partial oesophagectomy: diagnosis and treatmentBest Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology, 2004
- Chronic symptoms after subtotal or partial oesophagectomy: diagnosis and treatmentBest Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology, 2004
- The robotic, 2-stage, 3-field esophagolymphadenectomyThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2004
- Thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy for benign and malignant disease: lessons learned from 46 consecutive proceduresJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2003
- Surgery Plus Chemotherapy Compared With Surgery Alone for Localized Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Thoracic Esophagus: A Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study—JCOG9204Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2003
- Minimally Invasive EsophagectomyAnnals of Surgery, 2003
- Three-Field Lymph Node Dissection for Squamous Cell and Adenocarcinoma of the EsophagusAnnals of Surgery, 2002
- Prospective analysis of the diagnostic yield of extended en bloc resection for adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus or gastric cardiaBritish Journal of Surgery, 2001
- Surgical Treatment of Carcinoma of trie Esophagus and Cardia Among the ChineseThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1983