What limits the contribution of second-order motion to the perception of surface shape?
- 1 July 2000
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Vision Research
- Vol. 40 (16) , 2125-2133
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0042-6989(00)00032-8
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- On the relationship between the spatial channels for luminance and disparity processingVision Research, 1998
- dmax for stereopsis and motion in random dot displaysVision Research, 1998
- Effects of dot density, patch size and contrast on the upper spatial limit for direction discrimination in Random-dot KinematogramsVision Research, 1997
- What determines the maximum displacement limit for spatially broadband kinematograms?Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 1996
- Linear and non-linear filtering in stereopsisVision Research, 1994
- Perceived speed of moving two-dimensional patternsVision Research, 1991
- Interattribute apparent motionVision Research, 1989
- Drift-balanced random stimuli: a general basis for studying non-Fourier motion perceptionJournal of the Optical Society of America A, 1988
- Evidence for non-linear response processes in the human visual system from measurements on the thresholds of spatial beat frequenciesVision Research, 1973
- Depth perception in rotating dot patterns: Effects of numerosity and perspective.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1962