Making amends
- 1 December 1998
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Human Nature
- Vol. 9 (4) , 341-368
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-998-1014-1
Abstract
Conflict is an integral, and potentially disruptive, element in the lives of humans and other group-living animals. But conflicts are often settled, sometimes within minutes after the altercation has ended. The goal of this paper is to understand why primates, including humans, make amends. Primatologists have gathered an impressive body of evidence which demonstrates that monkeys and apes use a variety of behavioral mechanisms to resolve conflicts. Peaceful post-conflict interactions in nonhuman primates, sometimes labeled "reconciliation," have clear and immediate effects upon former adversaries, relieving uncertainty about whether aggression will continue, reducing stress, increasing tolerance, and reducing anxiety about whether aggressors will resume aggression toward former victims. However, the long-term effects of these interactions are less clearly established, leaving room to debate the adaptive function of conflict resolution strategies among primates. It is possible that reconciliatory behavior enhances the quality of valued, long-term social relationships or that reconciliatory interactions are signals that the conflict has ended and the actor’s intentions are now benign. Both of these hypotheses may help us to understand how and why monkeys, apes, and humans make amends.Keywords
This publication has 71 references indexed in Scilit:
- How to Cope with Noise in the Iterated Prisoner's DilemmaJournal of Conflict Resolution, 1995
- Victims' Responses to Apologies: The Effects of Offender Responsibility and Offense SeverityThe Journal of Social Psychology, 1994
- Methodological improvements for the study of reconciliationBehavioural Processes, 1994
- Children's reactions to transgressions: Effects of the actor's apology, reputation and remorseBritish Journal of Social Psychology, 1989
- Apology as aggression control: Its role in mediating appraisal of and response to harm.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1989
- Mistakes allow evolutionary stability in the repeated prisoner's dilemma gameJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1989
- The evolution of reciprocity in sizable groupsJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1988
- Sex differences in restoring justice: The down payment effectJournal of Research in Personality, 1983
- Children's reactions to apologies.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1982
- The Use of Apologies in Social PredicamentsSocial Psychology Quarterly, 1981