Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?
- 22 August 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier
- Vol. 352 (9128) , 609-613
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(98)01085-x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?Controlled Clinical Trials, 1996
- Assessing the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials:Current Issues and Future DirectionsInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1996
- Rectal aminosalicylate therapy for distal ulcerative colitis: a meta‐analysisAlimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 1995
- Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Placebo on the Outcome of Medically Treated Reflux EsophagitisScandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 1995
- An overview of family interventions and relapse on schizophrenia: meta-analysis of research findingsPsychological Medicine, 1994
- Bias in meta-analytic researchJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1992
- Incorporating variations in the quality of individual randomized trials into meta-analysisJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1992
- Continuation and maintenance therapy with antidepressive agentsInternational Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 1991
- Problems induced by meta‐analysesStatistics in Medicine, 1991
- Medical treatment of transient ischemic attacks: does it influence mortality?Stroke, 1988