Improved Preservation of Saphenous Vein Grafts by the Use of Glyceryl Trinitrate–Verapamil Solution During Harvesting
- 1 November 1995
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 92 (9) , 31-36
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.92.9.31
Abstract
Background High-pressure distension during harvesting damages the saphenous vein (SV) and may contribute to subsequent coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) occlusion. Application of vasodilator agents to the SV during harvesting may reduce the need for high-pressure distension and improve graft quality. We tested the effects of a vasodilator solution containing glyceryl trinitrate and verapamil (GV) or the conventional agent papaverine (Pap) on the pressure necessary to overcome SV spasm and on the structure and biochemistry of the SV graft. Methods and Results Thirty-six patients undergoing CABG were randomly allocated to receive an application of either topical and intraluminal GV solution, topical Pap, or topical and intraluminal Ringer’s solution (untreated) to the SV during harvesting. The peak and mean pressures required to distend the vein were recorded. Samples of SV were taken for microscopy and biochemical analysis just before we performed the anastomosis. The percentage of endothelial coverage was calculated by area measurements of stained en face preparations of the vein intima. The results for peak pressures (mm Hg) were: untreated, 479.2±27.5; Pap, 384.8±29.0; and GV, 309.5±28.3 ( P <.001, GV plus Pap versus untreated); and the results for mean pressures (mm Hg) were untreated, 136.2±9.6; Pap, 102.2±10.8; and GV, 98.0±8.3 ( P <.01, GV plus Pap versus untreated). The results for endothelial cover (%) were: untreated, 43.7±7.0; Pap, 44.1±9.2; and GV, 68.7±7.0 ( P <.05, GV versus Pap); and the results for ATP (nmol/g wet wt) were: untreated, 67.3±12.7; Pap, 112.0±19.4; and GV, 132.5±22.7 ( P <.05, GV plus Pap versus untreated). Conclusions First, pharmacological treatment of SV during harvesting, especially with GV solution, allows the use of a lower distension pressure and reduces the breakdown of high-energy phosphates in the vein wall. Second, topical and intraluminal use of GV solution during vein harvesting improves endothelial coverage compared with the topical use of Pap or no pharmacological treatment.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- A new technique for relaxing the saphenous vein during harvesting for coronary bypass graftingThe AustralAsian Journal of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgery, 1993
- Pharmacological relaxation of the saphenous vein during harvesting for coronary artery bypass graftingThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1993
- A Review of the Histologic Changes in Vein-to-Artery Grafts, With Particular Reference to Intimal HyperplasiaArchives of Surgery, 1988
- Nature and pressure dependence of damage induced by distension of human saphenous vein coronary artery bypass graftsCardiovascular Research, 1987
- Coronary bypass graft fateThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1986
- Endothelial Preservation in Reversed and In Situ Autogenous Vein GraftsAnnals of Surgery, 1985
- Biochemical and ultrastructural integrity of the saphenous vein conduit during coronary artery bypass graftingThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1984
- Changes in grafts and coronary arteries after saphenous vein aortocoronary bypass surgery: results at repeat angiography.Circulation, 1982
- Changes in saphenous veins used as aortocoronary bypass graftsAmerican Heart Journal, 1977
- Histologic Fate and Endothelial Changes of Distended and Nondistended Vein GraftsAnnals of Surgery, 1976