Caesarean section in Britain and the United States 12% or 24%: Is either the right rate?
- 1 November 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Social Science & Medicine
- Vol. 37 (10) , 1199-1218
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(93)90332-x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- Outcomes of Care in Birth CentersNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- Do Practice Guidelines Guide Practice?New England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- The Physician Factor in Cesarean Birth RatesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- A Successful Program to Lower Cesarean-Section RatesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- The Obstetrician's DilemmaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- Relation of Private or Clinic Care to the Cesarean Birth RateNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- An audit of caesarean section in a maternity districtBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1982
- The Effect of a Supportive Companion on Perinatal Problems, Length of Labor, and Mother-Infant InteractionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980
- Births by Caesarean section in the United States of America and in BritainJournal of Biosocial Science, 1980
- ACTIVE MANAGEMENT OF LABOUR AND CEPHALOPELVIC DISPROPORTIONBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1970