Evaluating Conflict of Interest Theory: Western European Cabinet Coalitions, 1945–80
- 27 January 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in British Journal of Political Science
- Vol. 14 (1) , 1-32
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123400003410
Abstract
More than a decade has elapsed since Robert Axelrod first published his theory of political coalitions. At the time, it represented a significant departure from existing theoretical work by defining as a major component of an actor's utility function a preference to join winning coalitions which minimize the degree of ‘conflict of interest’ among potential partners. Axelrod has defined the degree of conflict of interest in terms of the incompatibility of actor goals (e.g., policy preferences), thus deriving the expectation that forming coalitions will minimize the degree of preference disagreement among their members. Subsequent theoretical research has tended to retain this emphasis upon closely shared preferences among prospective coalition partners.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Concluding RemarksPublished by SAGE Publications ,2011
- Conflict of Interest Theory and Specific SystemsComparative Political Studies, 1981
- Testing Coalition Theories: The Combined EvidencePublished by Springer Nature ,1980
- The Durability of Coalition Governments in Parliamentary DemocraciesComparative Political Studies, 1979
- Probing the Bounds of Conventional Wisdom: A Comparison of Regression, Probit, and Discriminant AnalysisAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1975
- Party Coalitions in Multiparty Parliaments: A Game-Theoretic AnalysisAmerican Political Science Review, 1974
- GOVERNMENT COALITIONS IN WESTERN EUROPE*European Journal of Political Research, 1973
- On The Theory of Government Coalition FormationBritish Journal of Political Science, 1972
- Party Systems and Government StabilityAmerican Political Science Review, 1971