Twenty Years of Testing Theories: What Have We Learned and Why?
- 1 November 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency
- Vol. 27 (4) , 325-347
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427890027004002
Abstract
Despite 20 years of extensive research, criminology has not made scientific progress in the sense of falsifying some theories and accumulating verified knowledge in the context of other theories. The problem lies in theory. This article presents a new conception of theorizing as a cumulative, iterative, developmental enterprise directed toward falsification, rather than as an “all or nothing” enterprise directed toward explanation. Scientific progress requires that theorizing, like researching, be nurtured in graduate education, publications, grants, and faculty hiring, tenure, and promotion.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Effect of Parental Attachments and Direct Controls on DelinquencyJournal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 1990
- Community Structure and Crime: Testing Social-Disorganization TheoryAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1989
- DIRECT PARENTAL CONTROLS AND DELINQUENCY*Criminology, 1988
- On “Testing Structural Strain Theories”Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 1987
- Structure and control: Reconsidering Hirschi's concept of commitmentJustice Quarterly, 1987
- THE TRUE VALUE OF LAMBDA WOULD APPEAR TO BE ZERO: AN ESSAY ON CAREER CRIMINALS, CRIMINAL CAREERS, SELECTIVE INCAPACITATION, COHORT STUDIES, AND RELATED TOPICS*Criminology, 1986
- AGE DIFFERENCES IN DELINQUENCY: A TEST OF THEORY*Criminology, 1985
- Age and the Explanation of CrimeAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1983
- The General Preventive Effects of PunishmentUniversity of Pennsylvania Law Review, 1966
- A Reformulation of Sutherland's Differential Association Theory and a Strategy for Empirical VerificationJournal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 1966