Left main coronary artery stenosis: angiographic determination.
- 1 September 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 68 (3) , 484-489
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.68.3.484
Abstract
Reliability of angiographic assessment of the left main coronary artery segment was evaluated by review of 106 coronary cineangiograms from the Coronary Artery Surgery Study. The films were interpreted by three groups of angiographers: those at a clinical site, those at a quality control site, and those on a study census panel. Among the readings of these three groups, there was 41% to 59% agreement on the severity of the lesion, with 80% agreement on whether the lesion was greater or less than 50%. The severity of lesion, its location, or presence of ectasia or calcium did not affect the discrepancy rate, whereas segments that were unusually short, diffusely diseased, or obscured by overlapping vessels were especially difficult to interpret.This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Natural history of obstructive coronary artery disease: Ten-year study of 601 nonsurgical casesPublished by Elsevier ,2006
- Operative Risk Factors in Patients with Left Main Coronary-Artery DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980
- Aortocoronary bypass surgery: a 7-year follow-up.Circulation, 1979
- Reproducibility of a consensus panel in the interpretation of coronary angiogramsAmerican Heart Journal, 1978
- Comparison of angiographic and postmortem findings in patients with coronary artery diseaseThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1975
- Correlation of the Antemortem Coronary Arteriogram and the Postmortem SpecimenCirculation, 1973