Use of Positron Emission Tomography in Pharmacokinetic Studies to Investigate Therapeutic Advantage in a Phase I Study of 120-Hour Intravenous Infusion XR5000
- 15 January 2003
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 21 (2) , 203-210
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2003.02.008
Abstract
Purpose: XR5000 (N-[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl]acridine-4-carboxamide) is a topoisomerase I and II inhibitor. Because the cytotoxicity of XR5000 increases markedly with prolonged exposure, we performed a phase I study of weekly XR5000 by 120-hour continuous infusion over 3 weeks. Patients and Methods: Twenty-four patients with advanced solid cancer were treated at seven dose levels (700 to 4,060 mg/m2/120 hrs) for a total of 67 cycles. Three patients underwent positron emission tomography (PET) studies at the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) to evaluate normal tissue and tumor carbon-11 radiolabeled XR5000 ([11C]XR5000) pharmacokinetics. Results: The dose-limiting toxicity was National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (version 1) grade 4 chest and abdominal pain affecting the single patient receiving 4,060 mg/m2/120 hours, and the MTD was 3,010 mg/m2/120 hours. Other grade 3–4 toxicities, affecting single patients at the MTD, were myelosuppression (grade 4), raised bilirubin, vomiting, and somnolence (all grade 3). There was one partial response (adenocarcinoma of unknown primary); the remainder had progressive disease. [11C]XR5000 distributed well into the three tumors studied by PET. Tumor uptake (maximum concentration or area under the concentration versus time curve [AUC]) was less than in normal tissue in which the tumors were located. Tumor exposure (AUC; mean ± SD in m2/mL/sec) increased when [11C]XR5000 was administered during an infusion of XR5000 (0.403 ± 0.1), compared with [11C]XR5000 given alone (0.292 ± 0.1; P < .05), indicating that tumor drug exposure was not saturated. Conclusion: The recommended dose for XR5000 in phase II studies is 3,010 mg/m2/120 hours. PET studies with 11C-labeled drug were feasible and demonstrated in vivo distribution into tumors. Saturation of tumor exposure was not reached at the MTD.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of DACA (XR5000): a novel inhibitor of topoisomerase I and IIBritish Journal of Cancer, 1999
- Phase I study of the cytotoxic agent N -[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl]acridine-4-carboxamideCancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 1999
- Plasma pharmacokinetics of N -[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl]acridine-4-carboxamide in a phase I trialCancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 1999
- Mechanism of cytotoxicity of N -[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl] acridine-4-carboxamide and of its 7-chloro derivative: the roles of topoisomerases I and IICancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 1999
- Combined inhibition of topoisomerases I and II - is this a worthwhile/feasible strategy?British Journal of Cancer, 1997
- The potential of N -[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl]acridine-4-carboxamide]to circumvent three multidrug-resistance phenotypes in vitroCancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 1997
- From amsacrine to DACA (N-[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl]acridine-4-carboxamide): Selectivity for topoisomerases I and II among acridine derivativesEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1996
- Experimental solid tumour activity ofN-[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl]-acridine-4-carboxamideCancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 1995
- Comparison of the blood-brain barrier and liver penetration of acridine antitumor drugsCancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 1992
- Potential antitumor agents. 50. In vivo solid-tumor activity of derivatives of N-[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl]acridine-4-carboxamideJournal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1987