Comparison of Midwifery Care to Medical Care in Hospitals in the Quebec Pilot Projects Study: Clinical Indicators
- 1 January 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Canadian Journal of Public Health
- Vol. 91 (1) , I5-I11
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03404260
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare indicators of process and outcome of midwifery services provided in the Quebec pilot projects to those associated with standard hospital-based medical services. Women receiving each type of care (961 per group) were matched on the basis of socio-demographic characteristics and level of obstetrical risk. We found midwifery care to be associated with less obstetrical intervention and a reduction in selected indicators of maternal morbidity (caesarean section and severe perineal injury). For neonatal outcome indicators, midwifery care was associated with a mixture of benefits and risks: fewer babies with preterm birth and low birthweight, but a trend toward a higher stillbirth ratio and more frequent requirement for neonatal resuscitation. The study design does not permit to conclude that the associations were causal in nature. However, the high stillbirth rate observed in the group of women who were selected for midwife care raises concerns both regarding the appropriateness of the screening procedures for admission to such care and regarding the quality of care itself. L’objectif de cette étude était de comparer la nature et les effets des services de sages-femmes offerts dans les maisons de naissance et mis en place dans le cadre de projets-pilotes au Québec, avec les services médicaux courants dispensés dans des hôpitaux. Au total, 1 922 femmes ont été jumelées (961 par groupe) sur la base de leurs caractéristiques sociodémographiques et de leur risque obstétrical. Les résultats montrent que la pratique des sages-femmes est associée à une utilisation moins fréquente des interventions obstétricales et une réduction de certains indicateurs de morbidité (césariennes et déchirures du périnée de 3e et 4e degré). Par contre les effets concernant la morbidité néonatale sont mitigés: moins de bébés prématurés ou de petit poids à la naissance, mais une tendance vers un ratio plus élevé de mortinatalité et un besoin plus fréquent de réanimation à la naissance. Le devis de l’étude ne permet pas de conclure à des associations de nature causale. Cependant, le taux élevé de mortinatalité observé chez les femmes choisies pour recevoir les soins de sages-femmes soulève des préoccupations concernant la pertinence des procédures de sélection pour l’admissibilité à ce type de soins et la qualité des soins eux-mêmes.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Randomized Controlled Study of Birth Center Care versus Standard Maternity Care: Effects on Women's HealthBirth, 1997
- A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Nurse‐Midwifery CareBirth, 1996
- Randomised, controlled trial of efficacy of midwife-managed careThe Lancet, 1996
- Effect of Prenatal Ultrasound Screening on Perinatal OutcomeNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Simulated home delivery in hospital: a randomised controlled trialBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1993
- Birth setting for low-risk pregnancies: An analysis of the current literatureJournal of Nurse-Midwifery, 1991
- Ultrasound screening and perinatal mortality: controlled trial of systematic one-stage screening in pregnancyThe Lancet, 1990
- Outcomes of Care in Birth CentersNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- A retrospective comparison of certified nurse-midwife and physician management of low risk births A pilot studyJournal of Nurse-Midwifery, 1987
- Outcomes and Procedures in Low Risk Birth: A Comparison of Hospital and Birth Center SettingsBirth, 1987