Much ado about Peer Review
- 1 January 1986
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in BioScience
- Vol. 36 (1) , 18-21
- https://doi.org/10.2307/1309792
Abstract
This month we inaugurate a new BioScience department that will regularly offer a smorgasbord of scholarly opinion, essays in science and society, and biological controversy. We wish to see it become a forum for exchange, a fundamental part of BioScience that provokes as well as informs and presents ideas you might not otherwise encounter—in a style you might not otherwise find—in these pages or elsewhere in the biological literature. We invite you to respond to what you read here and elsewhere with essays of your own. Send prospective contributions to Roundtable Editor, BioScience, 730 11th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20001–4584.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Funding Science: The Real Defects of Peer Review and An Alternative To ItScience, Technology, & Human Values, 1985
- Secrecy in University-Based Research: Who Controls? Who Tells?Science, Technology, & Human Values, 1985
- Open Science and Closed Science: Tradeoffs in a DemocracyScience, Technology, & Human Values, 1985
- Research MalpracticeBioScience, 1985
- Fine-Tuning Peer ReviewScience, 1984
- Lessons from the Darsee AffairNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- The Public and Science PolicyScience, Technology, & Human Values, 1982
- Neutrality and advocacy in policy researchPolicy Sciences, 1975