Learning Component in Repetitive Maximal Static Contractions
- 1 December 1968
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Perceptual and Motor Skills
- Vol. 27 (3_suppl) , 1195-1200
- https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1968.27.3f.1195
Abstract
60 college men were given 12 trials on an unfamiliar and fairly complex test of static strength in a single testing period. 30 were allowed 1½ min. of rest between trials and the rest 3 min. It was hypothesized that individuals can learn how to exert force statically, i.e., significantly improve their strength scores, during practice on a test that requires the neuro-muscular integration of several muscle groups not commonly tested for strength. A second hypothesis was that there would be no difference in the amount learned between groups with 1½-min. and 3-min. rests. Results supported both hypotheses. The reliability of individual differences in learning scores was moderately high; r = .56 for single trials and .61 for a 2-trial average. Thus, individuals can learn how to exert force statically in an unfamiliar and fairly complex strength test and the influence of this learning effect can be determined, providing possible facilitative effects of training and inhibitory effects of fatigue are minimized.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Strength Variations in Two Determinations of Maximal Isometric ContractionsPTJ: Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal, 1965
- Quantitative Strength Changes with Test RepetitionsPTJ: Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal, 1965
- Mechanisms of Muscle Training in Man: Experimental Demonstration of the Overload Principle*PTJ: Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal, 1956
- The effect on muscle strength of maximum isometric and isotonic contractions at different repetition ratesThe Journal of Physiology, 1955