Opioid use by patients in an orthopedics spine clinic
- 7 January 2005
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Arthritis & Rheumatism
- Vol. 52 (1) , 312-321
- https://doi.org/10.1002/art.20784
Abstract
Objective Concerns regarding the efficacy, toxicity, tolerance, dependence, and abuse of opioids have limited their use for patients with chronic spine pain. In our previous study of rheumatology clinic patients, opioid analgesics were found to be highly effective, produced only mild side effects, and had few instances of opioid abuse. The purpose of this study was to replicate our previous study in another large cohort of patients with nonmalignant pain due to well‐defined spinal diseases. Methods Opioid use was studied in 230 orthopedics spine clinic patients by retrospective analysis of prescriptions for 3 years and cross‐sectional analysis of efficacy and toxicity by patient interviews. Opioid use and stability of the daily dose over 3 years were derived from computerized pharmacy records. Medical records, operative reports, and radiographic studies were reviewed to determine the reason for dosage escalations and to detect instances of abuse or addiction behaviors. Patients were interviewed to determine the efficacy, frequency, and types of side effects and instances of obtaining opioids from sources outside the Veterans Affairs system. Results Opioids were prescribed for 152 of the 230 patients, for 2 30‐mg codeine equivalents occurred 19 times in 17 LTO patients and was due to worsening of the underlying painful condition, complications of spine surgery, or unrelated surgical or medical problems in all but 3 of them (5%). These 3 patients also displayed other abuse behaviors. Abuse behaviors were not more frequent in those with or without a history of abuse/addiction. Conclusion This study provides data on the efficacy, toxicity, tolerance, and abuse or addiction behaviors with opioid therapy in a large cohort of patients in an orthopedics spine clinic. The results provide objective data from patients with well‐defined spine diagnoses to challenge the position that opioid treatment is inappropriate for chronic nonmalignant pain. This study provides clinical evidence to support and protect physicians treating patients with chronic musculoskeletal diseases, who may be reluctant to prescribe opioids because of possible sanctions from regulatory agencies. More important, it will benefit patients by permitting them to receive these effective, safe medications.Keywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Efficacy and Safety of a Once-Daily Morphine Formulation in Chronic, Moderate-to-Severe Osteoarthritis Pain: Results from a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Trial and an Open-Label Extension TrialJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2002
- Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scalePAIN®, 2001
- Opioid Therapy for Chronic Noncancer Back PainSpine, 1998
- Randomised trial of oral morphine for chronic non-cancer painThe Lancet, 1996
- Health Care Providers' Liability Exposure for Inappropriate Pain ManagementJournal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 1996
- Opioids, chronic pain, and the lawJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 1993
- Long-term use of opioid analgesics for the treatment of chronic pain of nonmalignant originJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 1993
- A long-term survey of morphine in cancer pain patientsJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 1992
- Long-term oral opioid therapy in patients with chronic nonmalignant painJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 1992
- Obtaining Confidence Intervals for the Risk Ratio in Cohort StudiesPublished by JSTOR ,1978