Anterior Interbody Fusion Versus Posterolateral Fusion With Transpedicular Fixation for Isthmic Spondylolisthesis in Adults
- 1 April 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Spine
- Vol. 24 (8) , 812-817
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199904150-00014
Abstract
Clinical and radiographic results were assessed in adult patients who had undergone operation for isthmic spondylolisthesis. To compare the results between anterior interbody fusion and posterolateral fusion with those of transpedicular fixation for the treatment of isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults. Successful clinical results after fusion can be expected in adolescents, but the adult type differs in that stability through fusion alone fails to ensure satisfactory outcomes. The role of decompression in the surgical treatment of adult isthmic spondylolisthesis remains controversial. Anterior interbody fusion has an indirect effect of nerve root decompression through widening of the intervertebral space, whereas posterolateral fusion with transpedicular fixation provides direct decompression. The clinical data of 40 adult patients who had undergone operations for isthmic spondylolithesis from June 1977 through June 1994 were reviewed. Anterior interbody fusion was performed in 20 patients (Group I) and posterolateral fusion with transpedicular fixation in 20 patients (Group II). The mean age of Group I was 44.1 years (range, 21-62 years), and that of Group II was 41.3 years (range, 21-57 years). Group I contained B men and 12 women, Group II contained 5 men and 15 women. The symptoms and signs in Groups I and II were similar. The duration of follow-up averaged 3.6 years (range, 1.1-16 years) in Group I and 2.3 years (range, 1.1-6 years) in Group II. The anterior slippage in Group I, assessed by the Taillard method, was 16.1% and was corrected to 10.4% after surgery. Anterior slippage in Group II was 15.2% and was corrected to 9.8% after surgery. The fusion rate 12 months after surgery was 90% in Group I and 95% in Group II. The clinical results were analyzed by Kim's criteria, according to variables on the improvement of clinical symptoms. Satisfactory results were obtained in 85% of Group I and 90% of Group II. There was no statistically significant difference in clinical results between anterior interbody fusion and posterolateral fusion with transpedicular fixation for the treatment of isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults (P < 0.05).Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Posterolateral Fusion for Radicular Pain in Isthmic SpondylolisthesisPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1996
- The Use of Primary Internal Fixation in SpondylolisthesisSpine, 1993
- Results of In Situ Fusion for Isthmic SpondylolisthesisJournal of Spinal Disorders, 1992
- Factors Affecting Fusion Rate in Adult SpondylolisthesisSpine, 1990
- 1989 Volvo Award in Basic Science: Device-Related Osteoporosis with Spinal InstrumentationSpine, 1989
- Biomechanics of Lumbar FusionClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1985
- Anterior Lumbar Interbody FusionClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1982
- Spondylolisthesis: Long-term Follow-up Study of Treatment with Total LaminectomyPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1972
- Anterior Interbody Fusion of the Lumbar Spine Indications and Results in 200 CasesPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1966
- Le Spondylolisthesis Chez L'enfant et L'adolescent1(Etude de 50 cas)Acta Orthopaedica, 1954