The Changing Pattern of Perceptual Analytic Strategies and Response Selection with Practice in a Two-Choice Reaction time task
Open Access
- 1 August 1978
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
- Vol. 30 (3) , 417-427
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00335557843000025
Abstract
In the experiment reported here the primary hypothesis proposed, which was supported by the data, was that subjects performing a two-choice self-paced serial RT task would learn to change their strategy of perceptual analysis of signals presented to them as they became progressively more practised. Early in practice each signal is identified as a particular state of the display and an appropriate response is then made. Well practised subjects, however, select their responses by reference to the change or constancy between successive displays. This strategy implies that the assumptions made by the generally accepted simple S-R connectionist model of two-choice serial RT may be quite misleading, since the choice of any particular response must be determined not only by the display state but also by what the previous response had been.This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Stimulus versus response probability effects in choice reaction timePerception & Psychophysics, 1970
- Repetition and probability effects in a serial choice reaction taskActa Psychologica, 1969
- Speed-error tradeoff in a three-choice serial reaction task.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969
- Sequential determinants of information processing in serial and discrete choice reaction time.Psychological Review, 1969
- Retention of visual and name codes of single letters.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969
- Decay of Visual Information from a Single LetterScience, 1967
- Chronometric analysis of classification.Psychological Review, 1967
- Choice Reaction Time as a Function of Stimulus versus Response Relative Frequency of OccurrenceNature, 1966
- Serial Choice Reaction-time as a Function of Response versus Signal-and-Response RepetitionNature, 1965
- S-R relationships and reaction times to new versus repeated signals in a serial task.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1963