Meta-analysis: A reflection on problems
- 1 August 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Australian Journal of Psychology
- Vol. 36 (2) , 239-254
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00049538408255094
Abstract
Since 1977 there has been considerable debate regarding the relative efficacy of meta‐analysis as a research methodology. The authors implemented a meta‐analysis to examine the question of the nature of the association between self‐perception and performance or achievements levels. The study (128 research studies; 1136 correlations) made us aware of the problems associated with designing and implementing a meta‐analysis. This paper discussed in some detail the problems encountered, namely topic selection, the literature search, coding procedures, sampling the literature, the use of a common metric, the use of significance tests, costs and time involved, and publication.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Self Measures and Achievement: Comparing a Traditional Review of Literature with a Meta-AnalysisAustralian Journal of Education, 1982
- The Relationship Between Self and Achievement/Performance MeasuresReview of Educational Research, 1982
- Reviewing the literature: A comparison of traditional methods with meta-analysisJournal of Personality, 1980
- Statistically combining independent studies: A meta-analysis of sex differences in conformity research.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979
- Meta-Analysis of Research on Class Size and AchievementEducational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1979
- Gender effects in decoding nonverbal cues.Psychological Bulletin, 1978
- "An exercise in mega-silliness": Reply.American Psychologist, 1978
- An exercise in mega-silliness.American Psychologist, 1978
- Meta-analysis: A mixed meta-phor?American Psychologist, 1978
- Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of ResearchEducational Researcher, 1976