Characterizing the Cluster Lens Population
- 10 January 2007
- journal article
- Published by American Astronomical Society in The Astrophysical Journal
- Vol. 654 (2) , 714-730
- https://doi.org/10.1086/497362
Abstract
We present a detailed investigation into which properties of CDM halos make them effective strong gravitational lenses. Strong lensing cross sections of 878 clusters from an N-body simulation are measured by ray tracing through 13,594 unique projections. We measure concentrations, axis ratios, orientations, and the amount of substructure of each cluster, and compare the lensing weighted distribution of each quantity to that of the cluster population as a whole. The concentrations of lensing clusters are on average 34% larger than the typical cluster in the Universe. Despite this bias, the anomalously high concentrations (c >14) recently measured by several groups, appear to be inconsistent with the concentration distribution in our simulations, which predict < 2% of lensing clusters should have concentrations this high. No correlation is found between lensing cross section and the amount of substructure. We introduce several types of simplified dark matter halos, and use them to isolate which properties of CDM clusters make them effective lenses. Projections of halo substructure onto small radii and the large scale mass distribution of clusters do not significantly influence cross sections. The abundance of giant arcs is primarily determined by the mass distribution within an average overdensity of ~ 10,000. A multiple lens plane ray tracing algorithm is used to show that projections of large scale structure increase the giant arc abundance by a modest amount 0.6) lenses is in good agreement with LCDM, although our simulations predict more low redshift (z < 0.6) lenses than were observed. (abridged)Comment: 19 pages, 15 figures. Submitted to ApKeywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 79 references indexed in Scilit:
- The shape of dark matter haloes: dependence on mass, redshift, radius and formationMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2006
- Strong‐Lensing Analysis of A1689 from Deep Advanced Camera ImagesThe Astrophysical Journal, 2005
- The Surprisingly Steep Mass Profile of A1689, from a Lensing Analysis of Subaru ImagesThe Astrophysical Journal, 2005
- Galaxy Size Evolution at High Redshift and Surface Brightness Selection Effects: Constraints from the Hubble Ultra Deep FieldThe Astrophysical Journal, 2004
- Do arcs require flat halo cusps?Astronomy & Astrophysics, 2004
- Tree Particle‐Mesh: An Adaptive, Efficient, and Parallel Code for Collisionless Cosmological SimulationThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 2003
- ChandraObservations of the Lensing Cluster EMSS 1358+6245: Implications for Self‐interacting Dark MatterThe Astrophysical Journal, 2002
- Profiles of dark haloes: evolution, scatter and environmentMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2001
- Statistical Properties of X‐Ray Clusters: Analytic and Numerical ComparisonsThe Astrophysical Journal, 1998
- Angular momentum from tidal torquesThe Astrophysical Journal, 1987