Bell's Theorem: Does the Clauser-Horne Inequality Hold for All Local Theories?
- 14 November 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physical Society (APS) in Physical Review Letters
- Vol. 51 (20) , 1819-1822
- https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.51.1819
Abstract
The claim that the Clauser-Horne inequality is valid for all local theories is criticized. The criticism is based on the author's proof that this universality claim is incompatible with the conservation law of angular momentum. There exists an infinity of counterexamples to the universality claim made for . So Clauser and Horne offer no valid proof of the nonlocality of the quantum formalism; consequently experiments like Aspect's cannot be said to refute Einsteinian locality.
Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Experimental Test of Bell's Inequalities Using Time- Varying AnalyzersPhysical Review Letters, 1982
- Experimental Realization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-BohmGedankenexperiment: A New Violation of Bell's InequalitiesPhysical Review Letters, 1982
- Experimental Tests of Realistic Local Theories via Bell's TheoremPhysical Review Letters, 1981
- Is Clauser and Horne’s factorability a necessary requirement for a probabilistic local theory?Lettere al Nuovo Cimento (1971-1985), 1980
- Bell's theorem. Experimental tests and implicationsReports on Progress in Physics, 1978
- Principles of Advanced Mathematical PhysicsPublished by Springer Nature ,1978
- Experimental consequences of objective local theoriesPhysical Review D, 1974
- QUANTEN-MECHANIK UND WIRKLICHKEITDialectica, 1948