Prospective versus retrospective approach in the search for environmental causes of malformations.
- 1 December 1967
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Public Health Association in American Journal of Public Health and the Nations Health
- Vol. 57 (12) , 2071-2075
- https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.57.12.2071
Abstract
To evaluate the reliability of retrospective studies in the search for environmental causes of malformations, the following study was made: A retrospective interview was performed with mothers of 203 dead or malformed children and a control group of the same size and the replies were compared with those obtained in a prospective study of the same mothers made in the 5th month of pregnancy. The comparison dealt with information on the occurrence of nonchronic diseases and the consumption of drugs during early pregnancy. The results indicated that only about 25% of the prospectively collected information was accurately elicited in the retrospective study. In addition, the results showed that 2/3 of the positive replies in the retrospective study could not be confirmed from the prospective interview or information collected from other sources.This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of the teratogenic effect of meclizine in manAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1965
- Relationship of Selected Prenatal Factors to Pregnancy Outcome and Congenital AnomaliesAmerican Journal of Public Health and the Nations Health, 1965
- [DRUGS AND WOMEN DURING THE CHILD-BEARING AGE].1964
- Arzneimittelverbrauch in der Schwangerschaft nach Aufklärung der Thalidomid-Embryopathie*Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 1964
- Some Problems Arising in Prospective and Retrospective Studies of the Etiology of DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1959
- THE INCIDENCE OF CONGENITAL MALFORMATIONS: A STUDY OF 5,964 PREGNANCIESPediatrics, 1954